<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Academic Journal of Surgery">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>5</Volume>
      <Issue>1-2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2019</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>07</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">The Reliability and Effectiveness of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core Head and Neck Module (EORTC QLQ-H&amp;N35) in Head and Neck Cancer</title>
    <FirstPage>12</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>15</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Caren</FirstName>
        <LastName>Dsouza</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Father Muller Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Vinay</FirstName>
        <LastName>Rao</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Associate Professor, Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat, Father Muller Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2018</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <Day>08</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: We aimed to test the validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaires for head and neck module (QLQ-H&amp;N35) in a tertiary care center.
Methods: Forty patients with head and neck malignancy completed the QLQ-H&amp;N35 while undergoing their treatment. Questionnaires given to them were translated into their regional language Kannada. Evaluation of the responsiveness, reliability, and validity of the questionnaire was undertaken.
Results: The data assessed the reliability of the scales and not validity. The questionnaire was receptive to changes over time; however, the applicability of the European questionnaire in Indian clinical set up was debatable.
Conclusions: Our data suggests that the EORTC QLO-H&amp;N35 is reliable and responsive when applied to patients with head and neck cancer in India. Hence, it may be used as a platform to test validity at a multicentric level.
&#xD;

&#xA0;</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/133</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/133/100</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
