<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Academic Journal of Surgery">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>3-4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Comparison of Complete Sinus Excision and Reconstruction with Sinus Excision and Umbilical Preservation for Treatment of Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus</title>
    <FirstPage>39</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>44</LastPage>
    <Language>ENGLISH</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Seyed Saeed</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shirangi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Panzdahe Khordad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahdieh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Amirbeigy</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kashan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Kashan, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Saeed</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nori</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Shahid Beheshti Hospital, Kashan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Kashan, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Zhamak</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khorgami</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Umbilical pilonidal sinus is a granulomatous reaction to hair shaft penetrating the epidermis of umbilicus from the external surface. In this study, the outcome of complete excision of the umbilical sinus with&#xA0;umbilical reconstruction and sinus excision with umbilical preservation is considered.
Methods: This study was a clinical trial. In this study, 60 subjects with umbilical pilonidal sinus were enrolled&#xA0; into two groups (Group I, complete excision of the umbilical sinus with umbilical reconstruction, n = 30,&#xA0;Group II, sinus excision with umbilical preservation n = 30). Discharge, bulging, pain, bleeding, and itching of umbilicus and existence of hair were registered in the base visit and then 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 monthslater. Patients with umbilical pilonidal sinus, who had not undergone any previous surgeries, were operated on using a technique that involves complete excision of the umbilical sinus followed by reconstruction of the&#xA0;umbilicus or sinus excision with umbilical preservation. Patients were then followed and wound complications,and recurrence were evaluated at post-operative visits (1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months&#xA0;later). Remission and relapse of each symptom were compared. Data were analyzed by SPSS version 16.
Results: A total of 60 patients underwent the operation; 55 (91.7%) were male, and 5 (8.3%) were female. The mean age in Group I, complete excision of the umbilical sinus with umbilical reconstruction was 29.9 years&#xA0;(18-45 years) and mean age of Group II, sinus excision with umbilical preservation was 28 years (19-42). Themean follow-up period was &#x666; months. Only one patient in Group I, complete excision of the umbilical sinus with umbilical reconstruction had seroma and hyperemia of the skin after the operation, and treated&#xA0; conservatively at an outpatient clinic. No recurrence was observed during the follow-up period, and the most&#xA0;patients were satisfied with the appearance of their umbilicus. The two groups were not different by the meansof age, sex and symptoms at baseline (P &gt; 0.050). Remission of symptoms were not significantly different inthe two groups (P &gt; 0.050). The probability of relapse of other symptoms were not different in two groups (P &gt; 0.050).
Conclusions: Umbilical sinus excision with umbilical reconstruction is a relatively simple and effectivesurgical option for treating umbilical pilonidal disease with acceptable patient satisfaction and no serious&#xA0;complications. It may also be associated with a low risk of recurrence.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/36</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/36/27</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
