<?xml version="1.0"?>
<Articles JournalTitle="Academic Journal of Surgery">
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>3-4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Misnomers in Hand Surgery</title>
    <FirstPage>30</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>32</LastPage>
    <Language>ENGLISH</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Razieh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nabi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Davood</FirstName>
        <LastName>Jafari</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hooman</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shariatzadeh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Farid</FirstName>
        <LastName>Najdmazhar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ajvadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Hand surgery literature is full of disease names and terms. Some of them are misnomers, which are misleading&#xA0;to physicians outside the specialty. Therefore, we decided to collect all misnomers and provide them via this&#xA0;paper. Considering development of sciences in future, perhaps avoidance from new misnomers is impossible,&#xA0;but awareness of this fact, lead us to be more ingenious in interpretation. On the other hand, we believe his&#xA0;collection would be interesting for most specialists in hand surgery and as well informative for others.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/34</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/34/25</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>3-4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Readmission Risk Factors in Patients of General Surgery Wards in Shiraz Hospitals: Applying LACE Index as a Predictive Indicator</title>
    <FirstPage>33</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>38</LastPage>
    <Language>ENGLISH</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Nahid</FirstName>
        <LastName>Hatam</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Health Service Administration, School of Management and Medical Information Science, Shiraz University of&#xD;
Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mehrdad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Askarian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Community Medicine, Shiraz Nephro&#x2013;Urology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences,Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Fahime</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khamzade</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Student Research Committee, School of Management and Medical Information Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Peyman</FirstName>
        <LastName>Jafari</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Peivand</FirstName>
        <LastName>Bastani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Health Service Administration, School of Management and Medical Information Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Today, the effective use of limited health care resources is increasingly regarded. Reduction of&#xA0;the readmission is one of the key tools can improve health outcomes and considered as one of the control levers&#xA0;that reduces health costs. Identifying the causes of readmission to the hospital helps to utilize hospital beds and&#xA0;facilities a more efficiently.
Methods: This case-control study had been conducted in general surgery (GS) wards in 2011-2012. Using chisquare test, t-test, and multiple regressions, we studied risk factors associated with readmission in both groups&#xA0;of case and control. Finally, the predictive power of the Length of stay, Acuity of illness, Co morbidity of the&#xA0;patient, Emergency (LACE) index was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results: About 20% of patients in GS wards were admitted within 30 days. There is a significant difference&#xA0;between the two groups in the following variables: age, sex, length of hospital stay, marital status, discharge&#xA0;season, congestive heart failure, diabetes and renal failure. The rate of readmission with LACE index which is&#xA0;compared with the ROC curve shows that it is significant (P &lt; 0.001 and Kappa = 0.22).
Conclusions: Awareness of the prevalence and risk factors of readmission is effective in planning and decision&#xA0;making for using hospital facilities efficiently. Identifying patients at risk of readmission and erforming&#xA0;training plan, ischarging and following up medical programs can reduce the rate of readmission and costs of&#xA0;hospital. Predicting readmission can be very effective but identifying an effective index is very difficult.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/35</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/35/26</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>3-4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Comparison of Complete Sinus Excision and Reconstruction with Sinus Excision and Umbilical Preservation for Treatment of Umbilical Pilonidal Sinus</title>
    <FirstPage>39</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>44</LastPage>
    <Language>ENGLISH</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Seyed Saeed</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shirangi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Panzdahe Khordad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mahdieh<ings (including Hb and serum &#x3B2;-hCG levels), size of EP mass and its location, endometrial thickness, free fluid in pelvic or abdominal&#xA0;cavity, type of treatment, and method were recorded.
Results: Of the study population, 58 had undergone laparotomy and 45 had undergone laparoscopy. Mean age, mass size, and B-hCG level before surgery were significantly higher in women who had undergone&#xA0;laparotomy. Right tubes followed by left tubes were the most affected sites. Unstable vital sign was recorded in the laparotomy group more than the laparoscopy group.
Conclusions: Results of the current study showed that women who had undergone laparotomy had significantly higher mean age, mass size, and B-hCG level and were more unstable than the laparoscopic group.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/5</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/5/5</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>1-2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Effect of Ephedrine on Pain and Hemodynamic Status on Injection of Propofol</title>
    <FirstPage>11</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>14</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hamidreza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sharifnia</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Resident of Anesthesiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Kamran</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shadvar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Anesthesiologist, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Omid</FirstName>
        <LastName>Azimaraghi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Resident of Anesthesiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Yasaman</FirstName>
        <LastName>Aghajani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Resident of Anesthesiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Maziar</FirstName>
        <LastName>Molaghadimi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Resident of Anesthesiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Maliheh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khosravi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Resident of Anesthesiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Movafegh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Professor of Anesthesiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Propofol is one of the drugs most commonly used during induction of anesthesia. The induction dose of propofol can lead to hemodynamic changes such as hypotension and bradycardia. Pain on injection is another side effect of propofol. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of two different doses of ephedrine on hemodynamic status and pain on injection of propofol compared to lidocaine and placebo.
Methods: In the present study, 100 patients were enrolled. A 22 gauge cannula was inserted into the veins on the non-dominant hand of all patients. The patients were randomly allocated to 4 groups and 10 ml/kg of saline was administered over 10 minutes from each of the cannulas. Then, patients received either of these pretreatments: 2 ml of Saline (group S); 2 ml lidocaine 2% (40 mg) (group L); Ephedrine (30 ug/kg) (group E1); or Ephedrine (70 ug/kg) (group E2). After 30 seconds all patients were administered 2.5 mg/kg of propofol with a rate of 1 ml per second. The patients were asked to give a score from 0 to 10 (0 = no pain and 10 = most severe pain) every 5 seconds until loss of consciousness. Systolic and diastolic pressures and heart rate were recorded before induction of anesthesia, before intubation, and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation.
Results: Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure and heart rate following induction in E1 and E2 groups were higher than S and L groups (P &lt; 0.001). There were no differences in systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial&#xA0;pressure and heart rate 1, 3, and 5 minutes after intubation between groups. Lidocaine and both doses of ephedrine reduced pain on injection of propofol similarly.
Conclusions: Lidocaine and high and low doses of ephedrine reduce the intensity of pain on injection of propofol. Small doses of ephedrine attenuate blood pressure and heart rate reduction after induction of&#xA0;anesthesia with propofol.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/7</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/7/7</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>1-2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">The Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Meniscal and Cruciate Ligament Tears of the Knee</title>
    <FirstPage>15</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>19</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Seyed Mohammad Javad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mortazavi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam University Hospital AND Joint Reconstruction ResearchCenter, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Sadegh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kalantar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohsen</FirstName>
        <LastName>Azadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad Hasan</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kaseb</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Imam University Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences,Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: During the past decade, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been accepted as the ideal approach for primary diagnosis of traumatic knee intra-articular lesion. Despite this, the overall diagnostic accuracy of MRI has been carefully scrutinized in Iran. The purpose of this investigation was to scrutinize the diagnostic accuracy of MRI of the knee in identifying traumatic intra-articular knee lesions.
Methods: We compared MRI findings with subsequent arthroscopic findings (as the gold standard) in 107 patients (107 knees) with a clinical diagnosis of traumatic intra-articular knee lesion. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the accuracy of MRI were calculated based on arthroscopic findings for menisci and cruciate ligaments.
Results: MRI showed the following results for medial meniscus: sensitivity 83%; specificity 37%; positive predictive value 46%; negative predictive value 77%; and accuracy 55%. For lateral meniscus it showed the&#xA0;following results: sensitivity 43%; specificity 86%; positive predictive value 40%; negative predictive value 87%; and accuracy 79%. MRI showed the following results for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL): sensitivity 62%; specificity 90%; positive predictive value 71%; negative predictive value 66%; and accuracy 75%. In addition, it showed the following results for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL): sensitivity 60%; specificity 94%; positive predictive value 42%; negative predictive value 98%; and accuracy 94%. The overall accuracy of MRI was 62.5%. We compared MRI accuracy in two time periods to investigate if there was any improvement over time. Our data showed a significant increase in the accuracy of detection of ACL injuries by MRI in more recent patients; however, there was no improvement in the diagnosis of other internal knee&#xA0;derangements. In addition, overall MRI accuracy was the same in patients from different age groups.
Conclusions: We concluded that the overall accuracy of MRI in diagnosing intra-articular lesions of the knee in Iran is comparable with other published studies in the literature. However, it could be improved; if radiologists and orthopedists work together to find possible flaws, their cooperation would result in optimal use of this diagnostic modality.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/3</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/3/3</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>1-2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Stapes Management in Tympanosclerosis</title>
    <FirstPage>20</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>24</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Mohammad-Taghi</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khorsandi-Ashtiani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Professor of Otolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Amir-A&#x2019;lam Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Varasteh</FirstName>
        <LastName>Vakili-Zarch</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Resident of Otolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Amir-A&#x2019;lam Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Kouhi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology, Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Amir-A&#x2019;lamHospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Stapes management in tympanosclerosis has always been controversial. There are evidences supporting stapes mobilization, but there are concerns regarding refixation and recurrence of conductive&#xA0;hearing loss; therefore, supporting stapedectomy.
Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical records, operative notes, and audiologic data of patients with stapes fixation (1994&#x2013;2011) were analyzed. Audiometric findings are reported according to the recommendations of the Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation of Results of Treatment of Conductive Hearing Loss.
Results: In the present study, 66 patients were enrolled (23 male, 43 female). Stapedectomy and stapes mobilization both had good hearing results (12.1 dB vs. 10.6 dB reduction in ABG) and there was no&#xA0;significant difference. Overall, 63.6% of patients had achieved good results (mobilization: 57.9%, stapedectomy: 71.4%). The difference in success rate between the two groups was not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Stapedectomy and mobilization of stapes both seem to be efficacious and safe in the treatment of stapes involvement in tympanosclerosis. The hearing improvement is long lasting in both procedures.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/6</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/6/6</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>1-2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery: Review of Pros and Cons</title>
    <FirstPage>25</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>32</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Zhamak</FirstName>
        <LastName>Khorgami</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery AND Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Saeed</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shoar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery AND Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Nasrin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shoar</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Delaram</FirstName>
        <LastName>Shakoor</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery AND Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Shirin</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mahdavian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery AND Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Shirzad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Nasiri</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery AND Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ahmadreza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Soroush</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery AND Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital,Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Aminian</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Despite huge advances in minimally invasive surgeries, efforts still continue for finding less invasive methods of surgery. Patients desire less postoperative pain as well as better cosmetic outcomes. This may be achieved by decreasing the number of laparoscopic ports in which all the surgical maneuvers are performed through a single incision. However, surgeons should be also equipped to act well while avoiding adverse events of the new practicing approach. Along with increasing trends in performing of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in routine practice, the number of assessing the pros and cons of this new modality is also on the rise.&#xA0;Although it has been claimed that SILS is able to make the dream of invisible laparoscopy true for patients and surgeons, consecutive studies regarding postoperative outcomes questioned the benefits of the new evolved technique. Subsequent meta-analysis also revealed equal outcomes for SILS in comparison to the standard laparoscopy. Our review aimed to outline the pros and cons of SILS.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/2</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/2/2</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>1</Volume>
      <Issue>1-2</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Delayed Haemorrhage Following Radical Gastrectomy: A Case Report</title>
    <FirstPage>33</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>37</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghorbani</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital, TehranUniversity of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Hosein</FirstName>
        <LastName>Mahmmodzadeh</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ahmad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Tajedin</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Saadati</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2015</Year>
        <Month>10</Month>
        <Day>05</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">A 53-year-old man, who underwent total gastrectomy and esophagojejunostomy due to gastric cancer, came&#xA0;back to the emergency ward with delayed intra-abdominal haemorrhage. The patient was suffering from a distended, painful abdomenn. The patient was hypotensive, tachycardic, and oliguric. Laboratory analysis detected severe reduced haemoglobin concentration and coagulopathy. After resuscitation and correction of coagulopathy, the patient was transferred to the operating room. At the emergency operation we found that intra-abdominal haemorrhage was from the transverse mesocolon and site of celiac lymph node dissection. Haemostasis was done by suturing, cauterization, and patches with Surgicel.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/8</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/8/8</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
her complications.
Methods: A total of 10 patients who had diagnosed with CSM and undergone surgical treatment at our&#xA0; institute evaluated according to the pre-operative and post-operative Nurrick classification and also pre-operative history and physical examination findings and elecrodiagnostic examination.
Conclusions: Because of progressive nature CSM and wide range of clinical manifestation, high index of suspicion, early diagnosis and early treatment prior to permanent spinal cord injury is recommended.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/40</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/40/30</pdf_url>
  </Article>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS)</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Academic Journal of Surgery</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2423-3218</Issn>
      <Volume>2</Volume>
      <Issue>3-4</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <title locale="en_US">Phantom Tumor of the Lung</title>
    <FirstPage>66</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>69</LastPage>
    <Language>ENGLISH</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ali</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ghorbani-Abdegah</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital, Tehran&#xD;
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Reza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Ershadi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Amir Reza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Radmard</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Radiology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Keivan</FirstName>
        <LastName>Gohari-Moghadam</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Pulmonary Disease, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Abbas</FirstName>
        <LastName>Sadat-Safavi</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Ahmad</FirstName>
        <LastName>Tajedin</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Surgery, Research Center for Improvement of Surgical Outcomes and Procedures, Shariati Hospital, Tehran&#xD;
University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
        <LastName>Bagheri</LastName>
        <affiliation locale="en_US">Department of Pulmonology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</affiliation>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
      <PubDate PubStatus="accepted">
        <Year>2016</Year>
        <Month>01</Month>
        <Day>16</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <abstract locale="en_US">Background: Localized interlobar effusions in congestive heart failure (phantom or vanishing lung tumor/s) are uncommon but well-known entities.
Case Report: The patient is a 60-year-old male with a history of dyspnea and surgical removal of kidney stonein 1 year ago.
Results: In chest-X-ray prior to the surgery an olive-shaped homogenous density, with a size of 30 mm &#xD7; 20 mm in the right lung have been detected. Computed tomography (CT) scan has been performed, and a&#xA0;homogenous mass with a well-delineated border in major fissure of the right lung and mediastinal lymphadenopathy had been detected. Serial CT scans revealed mass enlargement. In Ct guided, Transthoracic&#xA0;biopsy fluid collection along the major fissure of the right lung had been detected. Biopsy of mediastinal lymph node silicoanthracotic changes with focal hyaline fibrosis had been shown.
Conclusions: The diagnosis of the phantom tumor must be considered in any patient with congestive heart failure and lung mass. In this patient, there was no history of congestive heart failure which shows that&#xA0;phantom tumor could happen in non-chronic heart failure patients. Although the accurate diagnosis of the phantom tumor with imaging modalities in patients without congestive heart failure is very difficult but at least this diagnosis must be considered in a patient with a lung mass in the major fissure of the lungs.</abstract>
    <web_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/view/41</web_url>
    <pdf_url>https://ajs.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ajs/article/download/41/31</pdf_url>
  </Article>
</Articles>
