Evaluation and Analysis of Outcomes Resulting from Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization Using In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Ultrasound-Guided Techniques in Oncology Patients at Shariati Hospital
-
nima mohammadiafrakoti
,
mobin bararpour rokni
,
samaneh hajimola rabei
,
gita shoeibi
,
mohammadsadegh talebikahdouei
,
fatemeh aghaei
,
alireza khajehnasiri
Abstract
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are primarily used in oncology to protect peripheral veins and provide effective access to chemotherapy. This study investigated the results of in-plane ultrasound-guided imaging compared to out-of-plane imaging in patients with oncology-related CVC placement in the oncology department of Shariati Hospital in Tehran.
Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 50 eligible oncology patients over 6 months in 1400 at Shariati Hospital in Tehran. The patients were randomly divided into two groups: in-plane and out-of-plane, and the internal jugular venous catheter was inserted by using one of the methods above by an anesthesiologist. The necessary variables for statistical analysis were collected using predetermined questionnaires.
Results: The mean age of the patients was 73.42 years, with 25 female participants. The catheter insertion was successfully performed in all patients. The mean duration of catheter insertion in the study population was 2.289 seconds, the mean number of skin punctures was 1.7, and catheter placement was successful in 62% of patients on the first attempt. A total of 23 complications occurred, with carotid artery puncture being the most common—the catheterization method, whether in-plane or out-of-plane, did not affect the initial success of catheter insertion.
Conclusion: According to the findings of this study, internal jugular vein catheterization was successfully performed using both in-plane and out-of-plane methods with similar results.
1. Kehagias E, Galanakis N, Tsetis D. Central venous catheters: Which, when and how. Br J Radiol. 2023;96:20220894. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220894
2. Patel GS, Jain K, Kumar R, Strickland AH, Pellegrini L,Slavotinek J, et al. Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-hematological malignancies. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(1):121-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1941-1
3. Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E, Patrianakos AP, Kouraklis G, Poularas J, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients.Crit Care. 2006;10(6):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5101
4. Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, et al. Special articles: guidelines for performing ultrasound-guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society Of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(1):46-72. https://doi.org/10.1213/ ANE.0b013e3182407cd8
5. Ozakin E, Can R, Acar N, Baloglu Kaya F, Cevik AA. An Evaluation of Complications in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion in the Emergency Department. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016;14(2):53. https://doi.org/10.5505/1304.73 61.2014.93275
6. Hoffman T, Du Plessis M, Prekupec MP, Gielecki J, Zurada A, Tubbs RS, et al. Ultrasound‐guided central venous catheterization: A review of the relevant anatomy, technique, complications, and anatomical variations. Clin Anat. 2017;30(2):237-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22768
7. Buchanan MS, Backlund B, Liao MM, Sun J, Cydulka RK, Smith‐Coggins R, et al. Use of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter placement: survey from the American Board of Emergency Medicine Longitudinal Study of Emergency Physicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(4):416-21. https://doi. org/10.1111/acem.12350
8. Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, Mira JP,Kalfon P, Gros A, et al. Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1220-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMoa1500964
9. Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, Reeves ST. Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(1):46-72. https:// doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182407cd8
10. Saugel B, Scheeren TW, Teboul JL. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):1- 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1814-y
11. Baidya DK, Darlong V, Pandey R, Goswami D, Maitra S. Comparative sonoanatomy of classic “short axis” probe position with a novel “medial-oblique” probe position for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation: a crossover study. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(5):590-6. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.062
12. Vogel JA, Haukoos JS, Erickson CL, Liao MM, Theoret J,Sanz GE, et al. Is the long-axis view superior to the short-axis view in ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization? Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):832-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000823
13. Liu C, Mao Z, Kang H, Hu X, Jiang S, Hu P, et al. Comparison between the long-axis/in-plane and short-axis/out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided vascular catheterization: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:331. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S152908
14. Medicine AIoUi. Use of ultrasound to guide vascular accessprocedures. AIUM Pract Guidel. 2012:191-215. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2013.32.1.191
15. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S,Beverley C, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327(7411):361.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361
16. Polderman KH, Girbes AR. Central venous catheter use.Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1154-9
17. Brown S. Complications with the use of venous access devices.US Pharm. 2002.
18. Bova R, Saxe A, Phillips E. Effect of patient position upon success in placing central venous catheters. Am J Surg. 1996;172(4):380-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00198-5
19. Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE, Prudhomme M, Ripart J, Gouzes C, et al. Risk factors of failure and immediatecomplication of subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(8):1036-41. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00134-002-1364-9
20. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL,Heard SO, Maki DG, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(Rr-10):1-29.
21. Batllori M, Urra M, Uriarte E, Romero C, Pueyo J, López-Olaondo L, et al. Randomized comparison of three transducerorientation approaches for ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous cannulation. Br J Anaesth. 2015;116(3):370-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev399
22. Zhang J, Wang X, Miao S, Shi M, Wang G, Tu Q.Comparison of short and long axis ultrasound-guidedapproaches to internal jugular vein puncture: a metaanalysis.J Int Med Res. 2019;47(9):4069-4082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519867806
2. Patel GS, Jain K, Kumar R, Strickland AH, Pellegrini L,Slavotinek J, et al. Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-hematological malignancies. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(1):121-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-1941-1
3. Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E, Patrianakos AP, Kouraklis G, Poularas J, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: a prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients.Crit Care. 2006;10(6):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc5101
4. Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, et al. Special articles: guidelines for performing ultrasound-guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society Of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(1):46-72. https://doi.org/10.1213/ ANE.0b013e3182407cd8
5. Ozakin E, Can R, Acar N, Baloglu Kaya F, Cevik AA. An Evaluation of Complications in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion in the Emergency Department. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016;14(2):53. https://doi.org/10.5505/1304.73 61.2014.93275
6. Hoffman T, Du Plessis M, Prekupec MP, Gielecki J, Zurada A, Tubbs RS, et al. Ultrasound‐guided central venous catheterization: A review of the relevant anatomy, technique, complications, and anatomical variations. Clin Anat. 2017;30(2):237-50. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22768
7. Buchanan MS, Backlund B, Liao MM, Sun J, Cydulka RK, Smith‐Coggins R, et al. Use of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheter placement: survey from the American Board of Emergency Medicine Longitudinal Study of Emergency Physicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(4):416-21. https://doi. org/10.1111/acem.12350
8. Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, Mira JP,Kalfon P, Gros A, et al. Intravascular Complications of Central Venous Catheterization by Insertion Site. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1220-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMoa1500964
9. Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, Reeves ST. Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(1):46-72. https:// doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182407cd8
10. Saugel B, Scheeren TW, Teboul JL. Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement: a structured review and recommendations for clinical practice. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):1- 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1814-y
11. Baidya DK, Darlong V, Pandey R, Goswami D, Maitra S. Comparative sonoanatomy of classic “short axis” probe position with a novel “medial-oblique” probe position for ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein cannulation: a crossover study. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(5):590-6. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.062
12. Vogel JA, Haukoos JS, Erickson CL, Liao MM, Theoret J,Sanz GE, et al. Is the long-axis view superior to the short-axis view in ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization? Crit Care Med. 2015;43(4):832-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000823
13. Liu C, Mao Z, Kang H, Hu X, Jiang S, Hu P, et al. Comparison between the long-axis/in-plane and short-axis/out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided vascular catheterization: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:331. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S152908
14. Medicine AIoUi. Use of ultrasound to guide vascular accessprocedures. AIUM Pract Guidel. 2012:191-215. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2013.32.1.191
15. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S,Beverley C, et al. Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;327(7411):361.https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7411.361
16. Polderman KH, Girbes AR. Central venous catheter use.Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(1):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-001-1154-9
17. Brown S. Complications with the use of venous access devices.US Pharm. 2002.
18. Bova R, Saxe A, Phillips E. Effect of patient position upon success in placing central venous catheters. Am J Surg. 1996;172(4):380-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00198-5
19. Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE, Prudhomme M, Ripart J, Gouzes C, et al. Risk factors of failure and immediatecomplication of subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(8):1036-41. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00134-002-1364-9
20. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Dellinger EP, Gerberding JL,Heard SO, Maki DG, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51(Rr-10):1-29.
21. Batllori M, Urra M, Uriarte E, Romero C, Pueyo J, López-Olaondo L, et al. Randomized comparison of three transducerorientation approaches for ultrasound-guided internal jugular venous cannulation. Br J Anaesth. 2015;116(3):370-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev399
22. Zhang J, Wang X, Miao S, Shi M, Wang G, Tu Q.Comparison of short and long axis ultrasound-guidedapproaches to internal jugular vein puncture: a metaanalysis.J Int Med Res. 2019;47(9):4069-4082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519867806
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 7 No 1 (2024) | |
| Section | Review Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ajs.v7i1.16346 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Central Venous Catheter Ultrasound-Guided Internal Jugular Vein Oncology | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
How to Cite
1.
mohammadiafrakoti nima, bararpour rokni mobin, hajimola rabei samaneh, shoeibi gita, talebikahdouei mohammadsadegh, aghaei fatemeh, khajehnasiri alireza. Evaluation and Analysis of Outcomes Resulting from Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization Using In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Ultrasound-Guided Techniques in Oncology Patients at Shariati Hospital. AJS. 2024;7(1):10-19.
